This morning I was pondering the term “Web 2.0″ and wondered 1) Is “it” here and 2) if so, what are some good Web 2.0 sites? First, though, I needed to review a current definition of the term (technology changes, maybe the meaning of 2.0 had changed, too):
Wikipedia calls it “Web applications that facilitate interactive information sharing, interoperability, user-centered design and collaboration on the World Wide Web” and Backbone Magazine calls it “online social platforms to link individuals to each other and, increasingly, to connect companies to partners and clients. The real point, though, is that Web 2.0 happens when the talk goes from a monologue to a dialogue.” OK.
A quick Google search for “Best 2.0 Web Sites” delivered some great resources. SEOmoz—a Seattle-based company with an international presence that provides consulting, Internet marketing and search engine optimization services—has compiled a list of sites as part of an annual Web 2.0 Awards program.
Though I was disappointed to see that the most recent list is from 2008 (appears SEOmoz no longer does the awards), the list of sites was interesting. More importantly (for me), their system of ranking based on Usability, Usefulness, Social Aspects, UI & Design and Content Quality was most helpful in understanding the elements of a 2.0 Web property.
Canada’s Backbone Magazine compiles an annual Pick 20 list of top Web 2.0 pioneers and ebizMBA.com lists the Top 15 Most Popular Web 2.0 Websites as of January 2010.
Getting back to SEOmoz, though. From a branding and marketing perspective, the annual award seems to be a brilliant idea. It should have been a a great way to: link themselves with industry leaders and innovators, share their industry expertise, establish/build/reinforce credibility, build brand and product awareness and, ultimately, generate sales. I’m guessing that didn’t happen or the program required too much resource and couldn’t be justified. Nonetheless, wouldn’t it be interesting to know what actually came out of the effort?